TAL
Docket No: 6846-14/
10982-12
a7 Newremher 2014
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated
13 May 2014 with enclosures. You previously petitioned the
Board and were advised in our letter of 1 August 2013, that your
application had been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application, any material
submitted in support of your application, and prior case file.
Bfter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined your letter, even though not
previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to
establish the existence of material error or injustice. The
Board determined the letter you provided was not enough to
outweigh the significant misconduct you committed while on
active duty. Concerning your assertions that you were an
alcohol abuser, you sustained injuries and did not graduate from
high school, they are not mitigating factors for misconduct.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
the Board prior to making its decision in your case. in this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
1 record, the burden is on the
te the existence of material error or
regularity attaches to all officia
applicant to demonstra
injustice.
Sincerely, a=
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3775 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 December 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your letter explaining the events concerning your civil arrest even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5680 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the medical notes you submitted, © even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3162 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the psychological evaluation notes you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6136 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your letters, any material submitted in support of your application, and your prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire recoré, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4632 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, .sitting in executive session. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your assertion, that you had trouble with your younger brother, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7556 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4339 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4339 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5321 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 24 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11871 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 4 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your correspondence including your RCS Client Information Record and letter from your veteran center counselor, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error...